<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MSN AdCenter &#187; </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.semgeek.com/category/msn-adcenter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.semgeek.com</link>
	<description>Latest PPC News &#38; Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:59:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>If W. Edwards Deming Were a Search Engine Marketer&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.semgeek.com/if-w-edwards-deming-were-a-search-engine-marketer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.semgeek.com/if-w-edwards-deming-were-a-search-engine-marketer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt LeVeque</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN AdCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Search in General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systems Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standardization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semgeek.com/?p=2148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WITH THE RECENT economic tough times we are facing it has become more and more important to make sure the work you do is profitable. That is not to say that your work should not always be profitable but I believe in times of prosperity it easy to get sloppy and lose focus on doing the right work that adds the most value to your customer. In Paid Search it is easy to get lost in a sea of keywords and ad creatives making the focus on what matters and what adds value hard to understand. This is where being more process oriented in your work rather than focusing on results can lead to better value-added implementation. The Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) process developed by Dr. W. Edwards Deming* provides a frame-work for such value-added work to be completed by following simple, repetitive standardized work. Developing standardized processes for Paid Search ensures ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/pdca.jpg" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/pdca.jpg?referer=');"><img class="size-full wp-image-2149 alignleft" title="Deming Cycle &amp; Paid Search" src="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/pdca.jpg" alt="Deming Cycle &amp; Paid Search" width="192" height="262" /></a>WITH THE RECENT economic tough times we are facing it has become more and more important to make sure the work you do is profitable. That is not to say that your work should not always be profitable but I believe in times of prosperity it easy to get sloppy and lose focus on doing the right work that adds the most value to your customer. In Paid Search it is easy to get lost in a sea of keywords and ad creatives making the focus on what matters and what adds value hard to understand. This is where being more process oriented in your work rather than focusing on results can lead to better value-added implementation. The <a title="PDCA Explained by ASQ" href="http://asq.org/learn-about-quality/project-planning-tools/overview/pdca-cycle.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/asq.org/learn-about-quality/project-planning-tools/overview/pdca-cycle.html?referer=');">Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA)</a> process developed by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Edwards_Deming" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Edwards_Deming?referer=');">Dr. W. Edwards Deming</a>* provides a frame-work for such value-added work to be completed by following simple, repetitive standardized work. Developing standardized processes for Paid Search ensures quality is built into your campaign designs. Customer satisfaction should increase as a result. Better Paid Search processes also will reduce the time and costs associated with your work. Becoming more process oriented, in economic crisis or prosperity, makes you and your organization more effective and efficient and ultimately more profitable.</p>
<p>Following the PDCA process I&#8217;ve listed some guidelines as to how each step applies to a new or existing Paid Search initiative. The guideline is not exhaustive and it is not enough just follow the guideline and assume you are going to be profitable. It is critical for you to standardize each step of the process so it is easy to repeat.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>PLAN</strong></p>
<p>Planning is the most critical step in the Paid Search process &#8211; when done correctly everything else will fall into place. Planning includes:</p>
<ol>
<li>Review of Client Website and Offerings</li>
<li>Assessment of PPC Accounts</li>
<li>Assessment of Analytics Implementation</li>
<li>Client Goals and Past performance</li>
<li>Competitive Analysis</li>
<li>Campaign Structure and Design</li>
<li>Keyword Research</li>
<li>Landing Page Development</li>
<li>Ad Creative Development</li>
<li>Budgeting</li>
</ol>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>DO</strong></p>
<p>Once the plan is communicated and agreed to it is time for implementation. Implementation can be broken down into two main areas &#8211; PPC Campaign Build and Analytics.</p>
<p>PPC Campaign Build includes:</p>
<ol>
<li>Campaign Settings</li>
<li>Budgeting</li>
<li>Ad groups</li>
<li>Keywords</li>
<li>Ad creatives</li>
<li>Landing pages</li>
<li>Destination URL tagging</li>
<li>SiteLinks, ProductLinks, etc.</li>
</ol>
<p>Analytics Implementation includes:</p>
<ol>
<li>Java script development</li>
<li>Site tagging for analytics packages like <a title="VisiStat for PPC" href="http://visistat.com/index.php" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/visistat.com/index.php?referer=');">VisiStat</a> or <a title="Google Analytics for PPC" href="http://www.google.com/analytics/index.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.google.com/analytics/index.html?referer=');">Google Analytics</a></li>
<li>Audit site tagging</li>
<li>Verify conversions are tracking properly</li>
<li>Set up a method for reporting (if this includes using a PPC Platform like <a title="Pay-Per-Click (PPC) Management Platform" href="http://www.acquisio.com/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.acquisio.com/?referer=');">Acquisio</a>, additional steps will be needed to import campaigns into third party tools.)</li>
</ol>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>CHECK</strong></p>
<p>Now that you have launched your Paid Search campaigns and allowed then some time to run, it is now time to check the progress.</p>
<p>Monitoring &amp; reporting on progress includes:</p>
<ol>
<li>Review keyword activity for conversions and Quality Score</li>
<li>Search query mining for new keywords and negative keywords</li>
<li>Review text or display ads for conversion performance</li>
<li>Identify patterns in data for new targeting options</li>
<li>Review audience and demographics performance</li>
<li>Weekly Dashboard review</li>
<li>Monthly Dashboard review &amp; analysis</li>
</ol>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>ACT</strong></p>
<p>Evaluation of the first three steps should provide insight in to ongoing continuous process improvement.</p>
<p>Actionable insights on where and what to do next to improve performance include:</p>
<ol>
<li>Campaign and ad group targeting</li>
<li>Keyword performance and bid management</li>
<li>Keyword and Search Query expansion</li>
<li>Ad creative performance and future testing</li>
<li>Landing page testing</li>
</ol>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Again, this is a general guideline to follow. Using the PDCA process alone is not enough to keep quality, customer satisfaction, time, costs and profitability in its most effective and efficient state but it will give you a solid foundation to build from. By following the PDCA process you need to standardize the steps in each part of the process in order to tie those steps back to the amount of time and cost it takes to complete each step. Standardizing the processes allows you to make certain that you are using the most efficient way to complete the various tasks in the fewest amount of steps. Time, they say, is money. And lastly, you need to make sure you are not only following the standardization of the processes, but that you are also choosing to do the right type of work that adds value and meets or exceeds customer satisfaction and expectations.</p>
<p>*Deming&#8217;s PDCA (The Deming Cycle) was initially developed by Walter A. Shewhart. In his later years Deming updated PDCA to PDSA replacing the &#8216;check&#8217; phase with &#8216;study&#8217; since he felt that &#8216;check&#8217; emphasized inspection rather than analysis&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Related Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://asq.org/learn-about-quality/project-planning-tools/overview/pdca-cycle.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/asq.org/learn-about-quality/project-planning-tools/overview/pdca-cycle.html?referer=');">American Society for Quality (ASQ) &#8211; Plan Do Check Act</a></p>
<p><a title="10,000 Kicks with Bruce Lee &amp; PDCA" href="http://www.shmula.com/lean-training-pdca/8869/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.shmula.com/lean-training-pdca/8869/?referer=');">Training for Endurance in Lean (with PDCA) </a></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://www.semgeek.com/if-w-edwards-deming-were-a-search-engine-marketer/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><div style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0px" id="linksalpha_tag_1805762616" class="linksalpha-email-button" data-url="http://www.semgeek.com/if-w-edwards-deming-were-a-search-engine-marketer/" data-text="If W. Edwards Deming Were a Search Engine Marketer... " data-desc="WITH THE RECENT economic tough times we are facing it has become more and more important to make sure the work you do is profitable. That is not to say that your work should not always be profitable but I believe in times of prosperity it easy to get sloppy and lose focus on doing the right work that adds the most value to your customer. In Paid Search it is easy to get lost in a sea of keywords and ad creatives making the focus on what matters and what adds value hard to understand. This is whe" data-image="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/pdca.jpg" data-site=""></div><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.linksalpha.com/social/loader?script_type=buttons_counters&tag_id=linksalpha_tag_1805762616&link=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.semgeek.com%2Fif-w-edwards-deming-were-a-search-engine-marketer%2F&gplus=1&twitter=1&fbsend=1&linkedin=1&gbuzz=0&tumblr=0&reddit=0&pinterest=0&digg=0&stumbleupon=0&gpluslang=en-US&twitterlang=en&fbsendlang=en_US&gbuzzlang=en&twittermention=&twitterrelated1=&twitterrelated2=&halign=center"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.semgeek.com/if-w-edwards-deming-were-a-search-engine-marketer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Systemic Approach to Pay-Per-Click (PPC) Advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.semgeek.com/a-systemic-approach-to-pay-per-click-ppc-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://www.semgeek.com/a-systemic-approach-to-pay-per-click-ppc-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 18:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt LeVeque</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN AdCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systems Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppc strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systems thikning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semgeek.com/?p=1941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ANYONE WHO CLAIMS that paid search advertising is easy is misguided. Sure, at its core, the components that make up a paid search campaign are easy to assemble &#8211; campaigns&#62;ad groups&#62;keywords&#62;text ads&#62;landing pages. How to organize a pay-per-click account for Quality Score, conversion growth and cost efficiency is well documented but what is not well documented is the systemic approach that should be taken to achieve pay-per-click and search engine marketing results.
Today, pay-per-click platforms like Google AdWords, Microsoft adCenter and Facebook Ads are becoming much more complex. Beyond the core components of a pay-per-click account mentioned above, adding to the complexity of a pay-per-click account are features and tools such as campaign settings and automation, ad extensions and retargeting. At times the complexity can be overwhelming but there is a way to think about all this that can help you dance through your day as a search engine marketing manager ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Systems-Thinking-e1315418917369.jpg" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Systems-Thinking-e1315418917369.jpg?referer=');"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1942" style="margin: 3px;" title="Pay-Per-Click-Systems-Thinking" src="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Systems-Thinking-183x300.jpg" alt="Pay-Per-Click Advertising Systems Thinking" width="90" height="180" /></a>ANYONE WHO CLAIMS that paid search advertising is easy is misguided. Sure, at its core, the components that make up a paid search campaign are easy to assemble &#8211; campaigns&gt;ad groups&gt;keywords&gt;text ads&gt;landing pages. How to organize a pay-per-click account for Quality Score, conversion growth and cost efficiency is well documented but what is not well documented is the systemic approach that should be taken to achieve pay-per-click and search engine marketing results.</p>
<p>Today, pay-per-click platforms like Google AdWords, Microsoft adCenter and Facebook Ads are becoming much more complex. Beyond the core components of a pay-per-click account mentioned above, adding to the complexity of a pay-per-click account are features and tools such as campaign settings and automation, ad extensions and retargeting. At times the complexity can be overwhelming but there is a way to think about all this that can help you dance through your day as a search engine marketing manager a bit easier and it begins by thinking in systems. This elevated view and thought process into pay-per-click advertising and search engine marketing enables accountable parties the ability <em>to increase their capacity to think, learn, communicate and act more systemically</em><strong><sup>1</sup></strong>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>The Pay-Per-Click Dance</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In 2001, the late Donella Meadows published an article <a href="http://www.sustainer.org/pubs/Dancing.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.sustainer.org/pubs/Dancing.html?referer=');">Dancing with Systems</a> about her journey towards understanding systems. Dancing with Systems is a 14-step approach to learning how to develop your own way of working within any type of system – pay-per-click advertising and search engine marketing included. The key take-away for me by reading this article is that if you give up the need to control the system and predict outcomes you leave more time for delivering value-added work. The 14 steps include:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>1. Get the beat.<br />
2. Listen to the wisdom of the system.<br />
3. Expose your mental models to the open air.<br />
4. Stay humble. Stay a learner.<br />
5. Honor and protect information.<br />
6. Locate responsibility in the system.<br />
7. Make feedback policies for feedback systems.<br />
8. Pay attention to what is important, not just what is quantifiable.<br />
9. Go for the good of the whole.<br />
10. Expand time horizons.<br />
11. Expand thought horizons.<br />
12. Expand the boundary of caring.<br />
13. Celebrate complexity.<br />
14. Hold fast to the goal of goodness.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>When it comes to pay-per-click advertising, I&#8217;ve often thought that there is a certain rhythm, or beat, to managing accounts on a daily/weekly/monthly basis. I&#8217;ve written before about the idea that, if you listen and pay attention to what is important, keywords and text ads will tell you their story once the data begins to unfold. If you watch, listen and learn you will know what to expect from certain parts of the system and can prioritize work based on that knowledge.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Each day, search engine managers should crave to learn something new about an account or their approach to managing accounts and share what you learn not only with your immediate co-workers, but also with your clients. Like it or not, you are not isolated &#8211; everyone who touches a keyword is a part of the greater, global pay-per-click system. It is irresponsible to withhold information and doing so will come back to haunt you in the long-term. Collaboration and sharing of ideas and results, good or bad, can only help grow pay-per-click advertising efforts.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Paid search advertising has become an increasingly powerful marketing tool, but it also has the ability to make 95% of the users look like used car salesmen. Understanding the implications of how your approach to pay-per-click advertising, whether positive or negative, influences the greater system of search engine marketing and eCommerce is critical to its sustainability allowing you to dance all night long&#8230;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Resources</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1603580557/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=semscience-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399369&amp;creativeASIN=1603580557" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.amazon.com/gp/product/1603580557/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8_amp_tag=semscience-20_amp_linkCode=as2_amp_camp=217145_amp_creative=399369_amp_creativeASIN=1603580557&amp;referer=');">Thinking in Systems</a> &#8211; Donella Meadows</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0140800719/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=semscience-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399369&amp;creativeASIN=0140800719" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.amazon.com/gp/product/0140800719/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8_amp_tag=semscience-20_amp_linkCode=as2_amp_camp=217145_amp_creative=399369_amp_creativeASIN=0140800719&amp;referer=');">Systems Thinking</a> &#8211; F. E. Emery</p>
<p><strong><sup>1</sup></strong><a href="http://www.iseesystems.com/AboutUs.aspx" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.iseesystems.com/AboutUs.aspx?referer=');">isee systems</a></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://www.semgeek.com/a-systemic-approach-to-pay-per-click-ppc-advertising/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><div style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0px" id="linksalpha_tag_1341333144" class="linksalpha-email-button" data-url="http://www.semgeek.com/a-systemic-approach-to-pay-per-click-ppc-advertising/" data-text="A Systemic Approach to Pay-Per-Click (PPC) Advertising" data-desc="ANYONE WHO CLAIMS that paid search advertising is easy is misguided. Sure, at its core, the components that make up a paid search campaign are easy to assemble - campaigns&gt;ad groups&gt;keywords&gt;text ads&gt;landing pages. How to organize a pay-per-click account for Quality Score, conversion growth and cost efficiency is well documented but what is not well documented is the systemic approach that should be taken to achieve pay-per-click and search engine marketing results.

Today, pay-per" data-image="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Systems-Thinking-e1315418917369.jpg" data-site=""></div><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.linksalpha.com/social/loader?script_type=buttons_counters&tag_id=linksalpha_tag_1341333144&link=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.semgeek.com%2Fa-systemic-approach-to-pay-per-click-ppc-advertising%2F&gplus=1&twitter=1&fbsend=1&linkedin=1&gbuzz=0&tumblr=0&reddit=0&pinterest=0&digg=0&stumbleupon=0&gpluslang=en-US&twitterlang=en&fbsendlang=en_US&gbuzzlang=en&twittermention=&twitterrelated1=&twitterrelated2=&halign=center"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.semgeek.com/a-systemic-approach-to-pay-per-click-ppc-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Companies Increasing PPC Budgets, But Will Technology Shift The Spend Pie?</title>
		<link>http://www.semgeek.com/companies-increasing-ppc-budgets-but-will-technology-shift-the-spend-pie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.semgeek.com/companies-increasing-ppc-budgets-but-will-technology-shift-the-spend-pie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Meyers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google Adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN AdCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Search in General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppc software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semgeek.com/?p=1834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears companies will be spending more PPC Dollars over the next couple years, but the big question is whether we will see a shift in the &#8220;good &#8216;ol Search Engine Spend Pie Chart. However, this increase in spend to Pay-Per-Click (which everyone already knew would happen) will come at a premium price as the CPCs (Cost-Per-Click) across all platforms are increasing and in order for Advertisers to maximize the ROI%, they are going to have to rely on accurate Web Analytics, Conversion Tracking, Attribution and of course Reputable PPC Agencies, Consultants or &#8220;In-House&#8221; staff to carry out the work.

In a recent article entitled &#8220;Companies to Spend More on Internet Marketing This Year – Survey&#8221; written by Nina Varghese from PlanetInsane.com, Nina talks about how Google and Bing are set to see in increase in ad budgets because more companies who were recently surveyed will allocate more money to Internet ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/ppc-spend.jpg" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/ppc-spend.jpg?referer=');"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1843" style="margin: 5px;" title="ppc-spend" src="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/ppc-spend.jpg" alt="" width="220" height="173" /></a>It appears companies will be spending more PPC Dollars over the next couple years, but the big question is whether we will see a shift in the &#8220;good &#8216;ol Search Engine Spend Pie Chart. However, this increase in spend to Pay-Per-Click (which everyone already knew would happen) will come at a premium price as the CPCs (Cost-Per-Click) across all platforms are increasing and in order for Advertisers to maximize the ROI%, they are going to have to rely on accurate Web Analytics, Conversion Tracking, Attribution and of course Reputable PPC Agencies, Consultants or &#8220;In-House&#8221; staff to carry out the work.<br />
<P><br />
In a recent article entitled &#8220;<a href="http://www.planetinsane.com/companies-to-spend-more-on-internet-marketing-this-year-survey/2621280/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.planetinsane.com/companies-to-spend-more-on-internet-marketing-this-year-survey/2621280/?referer=');">Companies to Spend More on Internet Marketing This Year – Survey</a>&#8221; written by Nina Varghese from <a href="http://www.planetinsane.com/companies-to-spend-more-on-internet-marketing-this-year-survey/2621280/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.planetinsane.com/companies-to-spend-more-on-internet-marketing-this-year-survey/2621280/?referer=');">PlanetInsane.com</a>, Nina talks about how Google and Bing are set to see in increase in ad budgets because more companies who were recently surveyed will allocate more money to Internet Marketing than the previous year. The article also goes on to say that many of the retailers surveyed, will put more dollars into Bing/Yahoo. However, what the article did not mention at all was Facebook Ads, which has seen an increase in Ad revenues over the past year. According to <a href="http://news.softpedia.com/news/Facebook-s-Display-Ad-Revenue-to-Overtake-Yahoo-and-Google-in-2011-207006.shtml" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/news.softpedia.com/news/Facebook-s-Display-Ad-Revenue-to-Overtake-Yahoo-and-Google-in-2011-207006.shtml?referer=');">SoftPedia.com</a>, they project that <a href="http://news.softpedia.com/news/Facebook-s-Display-Ad-Revenue-to-Overtake-Yahoo-and-Google-in-2011-207006.shtml target="_blank">Facebook&#8217;s Display Ad Network</a> will beat rivals Google and Yahoo this year. Moreover, another interesting thing to note from the SoftPedia Article is <em>&#8220;the new revenue doesn&#8217;t even come from other web advertising budgets, it&#8217;s mostly drawing from budgets previously reserved to traditional venues, like TV.&#8221;</em><br />
<P><br />
So, now that we are starting to see a trend where more and more companies are continuing to shift more Ad dollars to the Internet, I want to know where &#8220;Tactically speaking&#8221;  will they be spending them. I would like to know the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>Search Networks</li>
<li>Google Re-marketing</li>
<li>Yahoo Behavioral Targeting</li>
<li>Display Networks</li>
<li>YouTube</li>
<li>Mobile</li>
<li>Facebook Sponsored Stories</li>
<li>Facebook Fan Pages</li>
<li>Facebook Ads (external)</li>
</ul>
<p><P><br />
<strong>More Ad Dollars means Better Efficiency:</strong><br />
According to Nina at <a href="http://www.planetinsane.com" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.planetinsane.com?referer=');">PlanetInsane</a>, she states <span style="color: #000080;"><em>&#8220;About 41 per cent of the companies surveyed said that they would divert some spend on Bing, for their Internet marketing. The latest technology enables advertisers to move search campaigns to Bing.&#8221;</em></span> Now, the AdCenter Desktop Editor is easier than the Bing Platform, but still is not as efficient as the Adwords Editor. On the other hand, there are much better alternatives than these Editors. In fact, software companies who focus just on the PPC Industry provide features which would significantly reduce the headaches of all of the &#8220;day to day in the weeds&#8221;. For example, <a href="http://www.acquisio.com/?cid=semgeek" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.acquisio.com/?cid=semgeek&amp;referer=');">Acquisio&#8217;s PPC Management Software and Performance Media Platform</a> offers the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>Google Search &amp; Display</li>
<li>Display Retargeting</li>
<li>Yahoo/Bing, Facebook Ads</li>
<li>Tracking and Attribution</li>
<li>Bid Automation &amp; Rules</li>
<li>Terrific Reporting</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
NNXX2HYJ2AN8</p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://www.semgeek.com/companies-increasing-ppc-budgets-but-will-technology-shift-the-spend-pie/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><div style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0px" id="linksalpha_tag_1042321939" class="linksalpha-email-button" data-url="http://www.semgeek.com/companies-increasing-ppc-budgets-but-will-technology-shift-the-spend-pie/" data-text="Companies Increasing PPC Budgets, But Will Technology Shift The Spend Pie?" data-desc="It appears companies will be spending more PPC Dollars over the next couple years, but the big question is whether we will see a shift in the "good 'ol Search Engine Spend Pie Chart. However, this increase in spend to Pay-Per-Click (which everyone already knew would happen) will come at a premium price as the CPCs (Cost-Per-Click) across all platforms are increasing and in order for Advertisers to maximize the ROI%, they are going to have to rely on accurate Web Analytics, Conversion Tracking, A" data-image="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/ppc-spend.jpg" data-site=""></div><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.linksalpha.com/social/loader?script_type=buttons_counters&tag_id=linksalpha_tag_1042321939&link=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.semgeek.com%2Fcompanies-increasing-ppc-budgets-but-will-technology-shift-the-spend-pie%2F&gplus=1&twitter=1&fbsend=1&linkedin=1&gbuzz=0&tumblr=0&reddit=0&pinterest=0&digg=0&stumbleupon=0&gpluslang=en-US&twitterlang=en&fbsendlang=en_US&gbuzzlang=en&twittermention=&twitterrelated1=&twitterrelated2=&halign=center"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.semgeek.com/companies-increasing-ppc-budgets-but-will-technology-shift-the-spend-pie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Changes Coming to Yahoo/Bing Trademark Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.semgeek.com/big-changes-coming-to-yahoobing-trademark-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.semgeek.com/big-changes-coming-to-yahoobing-trademark-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Meyers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN AdCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Search in General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semgeek.com/?p=1510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark your calendars on March 3rd, 2011 because there is a Trademark Policy change coming from Microsoft for the Bing/Yahoo platform. You don&#8217;t have the read all of the details, but in essence it screams &#8220;We need more market share and we can do this by allowing everyone to bid on each others Trademark search terms.&#8221; In retrospect, this is good for the Affiliate and Reseller Advertisers and not so much for the companies themselves. However, it does raise a few questions about how effective they will actually enforce these Trademark issues, especially since they are putting a majority of the responsibility back onto the advertiser. Seems like just another contribution to the &#8220;Wild West&#8221; of the PPC Industry. Let&#8217;s discuss the details.

Well, it appears that on March 3rd, Microsoft will stop any editorial investigations into complaints about trademarks used as keywords in the United States and Canada. They say ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/ppc-trademark-policy.gif" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/ppc-trademark-policy.gif?referer=');"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1519" style="margin: 5px;" title="ppc-trademark-policy" src="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/ppc-trademark-policy.gif" alt="" width="198" height="198" /></a>Mark your calendars on March 3rd, 2011 because there is a Trademark Policy change coming from Microsoft for the Bing/Yahoo platform. You don&#8217;t have the read all of the details, but in essence it screams &#8220;<strong><em>We need more market share and we can do this by allowing everyone to bid on each others Trademark search terms</em></strong>.&#8221; In retrospect, this is good for the Affiliate and Reseller Advertisers and not so much for the companies themselves. However, it does raise a few questions about how effective they will actually enforce these Trademark issues, especially since they are putting a majority of the responsibility back onto the advertiser. Seems like just another contribution to the &#8220;Wild West&#8221; of the PPC Industry. Let&#8217;s discuss the details.<br />
<P><br />
Well, it appears that on March 3rd, Microsoft will stop any editorial investigations into complaints about trademarks used as keywords in the United States and Canada. They say that the reason for this is to &#8220;<em>come in line with search industry practices</em>&#8221; and the only way to fight a Trademark dispute is to have the <strong>trademark owner should contact the advertiser directly</strong>. If that fails, then the trademark owner can fill out the <a href="https://support.msn.com/eform.aspx?productKey=trademark&amp;page=support_home_options_form_byemail&amp;ct=eformts&amp;st=1&amp;wfxredirect=1" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/support.msn.com/eform.aspx?productKey=trademark_amp_page=support_home_options_form_byemail_amp_ct=eformts_amp_st=1_amp_wfxredirect=1&amp;referer=');">Intellectual Property Complaints Form</a> and then Microsoft will start the investigation.<br />
<P><br />
&gt;&gt; <a href="http://advertising.microsoft.com/support-center/search-advertising/intellectual-property-guidelines" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/advertising.microsoft.com/support-center/search-advertising/intellectual-property-guidelines?referer=');">Click here to read the updated Microsoft Adcenter Intellectual Property Guidelines</a><br />
<P><br />
<strong>Some important points:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Microsoft will investigate complaints relating to alleged trademark violations in ad text.</li>
<li>Microsoft will continue to allow fair use of trademarks in ad text.</li>
<li>Microsoft is not a mediator. Microsoft encourages trademark owners to engage directly with advertisers who they believe are misusing their trademarks.</li>
</ul>
<p><P><br />
<strong>Microsoft accepts the fair use of trademarks in ad text, such as:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Use of a trademark by a reseller of authentic goods or services</li>
<li>Informational websites about goods or services represented by the trademark, such as product reviews</li>
<li>Ordinary dictionary use of a term</li>
<li>Comparative advertising, when supported by independent research</li>
</ul>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://www.semgeek.com/big-changes-coming-to-yahoobing-trademark-policy/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><div style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0px" id="linksalpha_tag_708505713" class="linksalpha-email-button" data-url="http://www.semgeek.com/big-changes-coming-to-yahoobing-trademark-policy/" data-text="Big Changes Coming to Yahoo/Bing Trademark Policy" data-desc="Mark your calendars on March 3rd, 2011 because there is a Trademark Policy change coming from Microsoft for the Bing/Yahoo platform. You don't have the read all of the details, but in essence it screams "We need more market share and we can do this by allowing everyone to bid on each others Trademark search terms." In retrospect, this is good for the Affiliate and Reseller Advertisers and not so much for the companies themselves. However, it does raise a few questions about how effective they wi" data-image="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/ppc-trademark-policy.gif" data-site=""></div><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.linksalpha.com/social/loader?script_type=buttons_counters&tag_id=linksalpha_tag_708505713&link=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.semgeek.com%2Fbig-changes-coming-to-yahoobing-trademark-policy%2F&gplus=1&twitter=1&fbsend=1&linkedin=1&gbuzz=0&tumblr=0&reddit=0&pinterest=0&digg=0&stumbleupon=0&gpluslang=en-US&twitterlang=en&fbsendlang=en_US&gbuzzlang=en&twittermention=&twitterrelated1=&twitterrelated2=&halign=center"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.semgeek.com/big-changes-coming-to-yahoobing-trademark-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing Uses Yahoo Search to Promote Sarah Palin Searchers. Bad Taste or Clever Strategy?</title>
		<link>http://www.semgeek.com/bing-uses-yahoo-search-to-promote-sarah-palin-searchers-bad-taste-or-clever-strategy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.semgeek.com/bing-uses-yahoo-search-to-promote-sarah-palin-searchers-bad-taste-or-clever-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 16:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Meyers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MSN AdCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semgeek.com/?p=641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, I was not expecting this from Yahoo and Bing. Frankly speaking here, when I noticed that Sarah Palin was showing up in Yahoo&#8217;s &#8220;Trending Now&#8221; section, I wanted to see why. Then, all of a sudden I saw a Yahoo Sponsored Listing for Sarah Palin coming from MSN/Bing and I said to myself &#8220;What the #$%#  is this? Are you telling me that a major Search Engine on the verge of launching one of the largest mergers in Search Marketing is using a controversial political figure to maximize their visibility through politics? Ouch!
In my opinion, that&#8217;s a very slippery slope, especially with using the &#8220;drill baby drill&#8221; Hockey Mom at the realm. Regardless of your political views, that is a dangerous tactic especially when were are living in a very polarizing political society and the last thing a search engine needs is to come across like they are supporting ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong><a href="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Screen-shot-2010-07-12-at-12.06.47-PM.png" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Screen-shot-2010-07-12-at-12.06.47-PM.png?referer=');"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-653" title="Screen shot 2010-07-12 at 12.06.47 PM" src="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Screen-shot-2010-07-12-at-12.06.47-PM.png" alt="" width="158" height="188" /></a>Wow, I was not expecting this from Yahoo and Bing. </strong></em>Frankly speaking here, when I noticed that Sarah Palin was showing up in <strong>Yahoo&#8217;s &#8220;Trending Now&#8221;</strong> section, I wanted to see why. Then, all of a sudden I saw a <span style="color: #800080;"><strong>Yahoo Sponsored Listing</strong></span> for Sarah Palin coming from MSN/Bing and I said to myself &#8220;What the #$%#  is this? Are you telling me that a major Search Engine on the verge of launching one of the largest mergers in Search Marketing is<em> using a controversial political figure to maximize their visibility through politics?</em> Ouch!</p>
<p>In my opinion, that&#8217;s a very slippery slope, especially with using the &#8220;drill baby drill&#8221; Hockey Mom at the realm. Regardless of your political views, that is a dangerous tactic especially when were are living in a very polarizing political society and the last thing a search engine needs is to come across like they are supporting a specific political party or organization.</p>
<p><strong>See the Actual Screen-shot below (or do your own Yahoo Search)</strong><br />
<a href="http://search.yahoo.com/search?cs=bz&amp;p=Sarah+Palin&amp;fr=fp-tts-701&amp;fr2=ps" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/search.yahoo.com/search?cs=bz_amp_p=Sarah+Palin_amp_fr=fp-tts-701_amp_fr2=ps&amp;referer=');">http://search.yahoo.com/search?cs=bz&amp;p=Sarah+Palin&amp;fr=fp-tts-701&amp;fr2=ps</a></p>
<p><a href="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Screen-shot-2010-07-12-at-11.54.02-AM.png" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Screen-shot-2010-07-12-at-11.54.02-AM.png?referer=');"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-645" title="Screen shot 2010-07-12 at 11.54.02 AM" src="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Screen-shot-2010-07-12-at-11.54.02-AM.png" alt="" width="686" height="222" /></a></p>
<ol>
<li><strong>What&#8217;s your opinion on this? </strong></li>
<li><strong>Do you think this is in Bad Taste?</strong></li>
<li><strong>Let us know your thoughts?</strong></li>
</ol>
<p><P><br />
<P align="center"></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://www.semgeek.com/bing-uses-yahoo-search-to-promote-sarah-palin-searchers-bad-taste-or-clever-strategy/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><div style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0px" id="linksalpha_tag_1853677955" class="linksalpha-email-button" data-url="http://www.semgeek.com/bing-uses-yahoo-search-to-promote-sarah-palin-searchers-bad-taste-or-clever-strategy/" data-text="Bing Uses Yahoo Search to Promote Sarah Palin Searchers. Bad Taste or Clever Strategy?" data-desc="Wow, I was not expecting this from Yahoo and Bing. Frankly speaking here, when I noticed that Sarah Palin was showing up in Yahoo's "Trending Now" section, I wanted to see why. Then, all of a sudden I saw a Yahoo Sponsored Listing for Sarah Palin coming from MSN/Bing and I said to myself "What the #$%#  is this? Are you telling me that a major Search Engine on the verge of launching one of the largest mergers in Search Marketing is using a controversial political figure to maximize their visibi" data-image="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Screen-shot-2010-07-12-at-12.06.47-PM.png" data-site=""></div><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.linksalpha.com/social/loader?script_type=buttons_counters&tag_id=linksalpha_tag_1853677955&link=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.semgeek.com%2Fbing-uses-yahoo-search-to-promote-sarah-palin-searchers-bad-taste-or-clever-strategy%2F&gplus=1&twitter=1&fbsend=1&linkedin=1&gbuzz=0&tumblr=0&reddit=0&pinterest=0&digg=0&stumbleupon=0&gpluslang=en-US&twitterlang=en&fbsendlang=en_US&gbuzzlang=en&twittermention=&twitterrelated1=&twitterrelated2=&halign=center"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.semgeek.com/bing-uses-yahoo-search-to-promote-sarah-palin-searchers-bad-taste-or-clever-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo Search Learning From Past Panama Mistakes With New Bing Alliance Transition</title>
		<link>http://www.semgeek.com/yahoo-search-learning-from-past-panama-mistakes-with-new-bing-alliance-transition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.semgeek.com/yahoo-search-learning-from-past-panama-mistakes-with-new-bing-alliance-transition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Meyers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MSN AdCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Search in General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semgeek.com/?p=590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If any of you lived through the nightmares of the Yahoo Panama transition disaster back in 2007 or heard about it, you will understand where I am coming from. I have to say I am somewhat impressed by the frequent email communication on behalf of Yahoo during the transition with Bing/MSN. Furthermore, after a recent conversation with a Yahoo Rep, I am getting the feeling that Yahoo is trying harder than ever to make this Bing transition as painless and transparent as possible.

Yahoo Search Emergency Transition Preparation:
In a recent email that went out, Yahoo expeditiously has told their advertisers that they will  soon be able to drive traffic from both engines and their partners within the convenience of one account as the transition will force Yahoo Advertisers to use the Account within Microsoft Advertising adCenter.

Another interesting point to note is that Yahoo will be providing it&#8217;s advertisers with a ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Yahoo and MSN Search Alliance" href="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/yahoo-bing-alliance.jpg" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/yahoo-bing-alliance.jpg?referer=');"><img class="size-medium wp-image-591 alignleft" style="margin: 5px;" title="yahoo-bing-alliance" src="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/yahoo-bing-alliance-300x182.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="182" /></a>If any of you lived through the nightmares of the Yahoo Panama transition disaster back in 2007 or heard about it, you will understand where I am coming from. I have to say I am somewhat impressed by the frequent email communication on behalf of Yahoo during the transition with Bing/MSN. Furthermore, after a recent conversation with a Yahoo Rep, I am getting the feeling that Yahoo is trying harder than ever to make this Bing transition as painless and transparent as possible.<br />
<P><br />
<strong>Yahoo Search Emergency Transition Preparation:</strong><br />
In a recent email that went out, Yahoo expeditiously has told their advertisers that they will  soon be able to drive traffic from both engines and their partners within the convenience of one account as the transition will force Yahoo Advertisers to use the Account within Microsoft Advertising adCenter.<br />
<P><br />
Another interesting point to note is that Yahoo will be providing it&#8217;s advertisers with a series of emails to help the transition as well as provide tips and advice to prepare for the transition as well as &#8220;We strongly recommend that you follow the provided guidance to help make your transition experience smooth and to get your ads live within adCenter as quickly as possible.&#8221;<br />
<P><br />
So in a Nutshell, Yahoo is doing the right thing by educating their advertisers on how to best keep them informed as well as help them avoid the horrible memories of the past Yahoo Panama debacle. The key question I have is who is pushing this? Is it Microsoft to protect it&#8217;s reputation or is it Yahoo trying to put a band-aid on the past. No matter of the who, what and why, all I know is that it&#8217;s better this way than no communication at all.</p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://www.semgeek.com/yahoo-search-learning-from-past-panama-mistakes-with-new-bing-alliance-transition/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><div style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0px" id="linksalpha_tag_1993598111" class="linksalpha-email-button" data-url="http://www.semgeek.com/yahoo-search-learning-from-past-panama-mistakes-with-new-bing-alliance-transition/" data-text="Yahoo Search Learning From Past Panama Mistakes With New Bing Alliance Transition" data-desc="If any of you lived through the nightmares of the Yahoo Panama transition disaster back in 2007 or heard about it, you will understand where I am coming from. I have to say I am somewhat impressed by the frequent email communication on behalf of Yahoo during the transition with Bing/MSN. Furthermore, after a recent conversation with a Yahoo Rep, I am getting the feeling that Yahoo is trying harder than ever to make this Bing transition as painless and transparent as possible.

Yahoo Search Eme" data-image="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/yahoo-bing-alliance.jpg" data-site=""></div><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.linksalpha.com/social/loader?script_type=buttons_counters&tag_id=linksalpha_tag_1993598111&link=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.semgeek.com%2Fyahoo-search-learning-from-past-panama-mistakes-with-new-bing-alliance-transition%2F&gplus=1&twitter=1&fbsend=1&linkedin=1&gbuzz=0&tumblr=0&reddit=0&pinterest=0&digg=0&stumbleupon=0&gpluslang=en-US&twitterlang=en&fbsendlang=en_US&gbuzzlang=en&twittermention=&twitterrelated1=&twitterrelated2=&halign=center"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.semgeek.com/yahoo-search-learning-from-past-panama-mistakes-with-new-bing-alliance-transition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo Search Planning on Improving International Search Networks with Bing Alliance</title>
		<link>http://www.semgeek.com/yahoo-search-planning-on-improving-international-search-networks-with-bing-alliance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.semgeek.com/yahoo-search-planning-on-improving-international-search-networks-with-bing-alliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Meyers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN AdCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semgeek.com/?p=566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I figured this has been an OLD ISSUE for years, but it&#8217;s just hard to imagine that some Search Engine Advertising Platforms still do not make it easy for anyone to spend their Ad dollars across global networks. Google has quickly succeeded at this by allowing any typical search account to drive traffic across all countries and search networks with a click of a button. However Yahoo still has not adapted to this, but as I wad told by Yahoo (and frankly assumed) that once the alliance with Bing takes over, that geo targeting problem will be a thing of the past. Let&#8217;s discuss&#8230;.
Before I contacted Yahoo as to why I could not choose a different country, I was asking myself questions like:

 &#8220;Why the hell can&#8217;t I choose a different country?&#8221;
Is something broken with this account?
Is the client&#8217;s account not spending enough?

Ask your Yahoo Rep to Help You Find ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Screen-shot-2010-06-23-at-9.53.57-AM.png" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Screen-shot-2010-06-23-at-9.53.57-AM.png?referer=');"><img class="size-full wp-image-570 alignleft" title="Screen shot 2010-06-23 at 9.53.57 AM" src="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Screen-shot-2010-06-23-at-9.53.57-AM.png" alt="" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="222" height="222" /></a>I figured this has been an OLD ISSUE for years, but it&#8217;s just hard to imagine that some Search Engine Advertising Platforms still do not make it easy for anyone to spend their Ad dollars across global networks. Google has quickly succeeded at this by allowing any typical search account to drive traffic across all countries and search networks with a click of a button. However Yahoo still has not adapted to this, but as I wad told by Yahoo (and frankly assumed) that once the alliance with Bing takes over, that geo targeting problem will be a thing of the past. Let&#8217;s discuss&#8230;.</p>
<p>Before I contacted Yahoo as to why I could not choose a different country, I was asking myself questions like:</p>
<ul>
<li> &#8220;Why the hell can&#8217;t I choose a different country?&#8221;</li>
<li>Is something broken with this account?</li>
<li>Is the client&#8217;s account not spending enough?</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Ask your Yahoo Rep to Help You Find an International Rep.</strong><br />
Frankly, I was surprised to know that Yahoo does not necessarily support multiple countries outside of USA and Canada through a U.S. created Sponsored Search Account. In order to advertise outside of the US, you will have to get in contact with an International Account Rep. who has to assist you.</p>
<p><strong>Here&#8217;s another Temporary Work-Around:</strong></p>
<ol>
<li> Go to <a href="http://everything.yahoo.com/us/?world" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/everything.yahoo.com/us/?world&amp;referer=');">http://everything.yahoo.com/us/?world</a></li>
<li>Choose the country you want to advertise in.</li>
<li>Go to that country’s home page and at the bottom you will find the “Advertise With Us” link.</li>
<li>Click that link an you’ll be able to open an account.</li>
</ol>
<p>However, Yahoo told me that even though this is not the best process to follow, it will be<strong> phased out and be much easier once the Search Alliance goes through. </strong></p>
<p><em>Yeah, that would make it easier to spend more ad dollars.</em><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://www.semgeek.com/yahoo-search-planning-on-improving-international-search-networks-with-bing-alliance/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><div style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0px" id="linksalpha_tag_669970423" class="linksalpha-email-button" data-url="http://www.semgeek.com/yahoo-search-planning-on-improving-international-search-networks-with-bing-alliance/" data-text="Yahoo Search Planning on Improving International Search Networks with Bing Alliance" data-desc="I figured this has been an OLD ISSUE for years, but it's just hard to imagine that some Search Engine Advertising Platforms still do not make it easy for anyone to spend their Ad dollars across global networks. Google has quickly succeeded at this by allowing any typical search account to drive traffic across all countries and search networks with a click of a button. However Yahoo still has not adapted to this, but as I wad told by Yahoo (and frankly assumed) that once the alliance with Bing ta" data-image="http://media.semgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Screen-shot-2010-06-23-at-9.53.57-AM.png" data-site=""></div><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.linksalpha.com/social/loader?script_type=buttons_counters&tag_id=linksalpha_tag_669970423&link=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.semgeek.com%2Fyahoo-search-planning-on-improving-international-search-networks-with-bing-alliance%2F&gplus=1&twitter=1&fbsend=1&linkedin=1&gbuzz=0&tumblr=0&reddit=0&pinterest=0&digg=0&stumbleupon=0&gpluslang=en-US&twitterlang=en&fbsendlang=en_US&gbuzzlang=en&twittermention=&twitterrelated1=&twitterrelated2=&halign=center"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.semgeek.com/yahoo-search-planning-on-improving-international-search-networks-with-bing-alliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MSN AdCenter Desktop PPC Tool Leaves PPC Mac People In The Dark</title>
		<link>http://www.semgeek.com/msn-adcenter-desktop-ppc-tool-leaves-ppc-mac-people-in-the-dark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.semgeek.com/msn-adcenter-desktop-ppc-tool-leaves-ppc-mac-people-in-the-dark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Meyers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funny Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN AdCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adcenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adcenter desktop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semgeek.net/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ As MSN AdCenter continues to remain at the bottom of the SEM (Market Share) Pool, you would think that Microsoft would put their rivalry with Apple aside and focus their efforts on the PPC advertiser and not their Egos. It&#39;s surprising, because their support team is pretty good and listens well to their clients, while their online interface and everything else is not that impressive.
Imagine the growth possibilities if they would just make it easier for their advertisers to spend more money by providing a tool that would allow them to manage their accounts more efficiently. The fact that this tool ONLY supports Windows is a little troubling to me in this day and age. As you may know, this Tool (still in BETA) has been available since February 2009 and frankly I am a little bit surprised that there has not been more talk about the lack of ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.semgeek.com/.a/6a00d8341c904953ef012876d65f09970c-popup" onclick="window.open(this.href,&#39;_blank&#39;,&#39;scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0&#39;); return false" style="float: left;"><img alt="Msn-adcenter-desktop-mac-us" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8341c904953ef012876d65f09970c " src="http://www.semgeek.com/.a/6a00d8341c904953ef012876d65f09970c-200wi" style="margin: 0pt 5px 5px 0pt; width: 200px;" title="Msn-adcenter-desktop-mac-us" /></a> As MSN AdCenter continues to remain at the bottom of the SEM (Market Share) Pool, you would think that Microsoft would put their rivalry with Apple aside and focus their efforts on the PPC advertiser and not their Egos. It&#39;s surprising, because their <em><strong>support team is pretty good and listens well to their clients</strong></em>, while their online interface and everything else is not that impressive.</p>
<p>Imagine the growth possibilities if they would just make it easier for their advertisers to spend more money by providing a tool that would allow them to manage their accounts more efficiently. The fact that this tool ONLY supports Windows is a little troubling to me in this day and age. As you may know, this Tool (still in BETA) has been available since February 2009 and frankly I am a little bit surprised that there has not been more talk about the lack of MAC support.
<p>Don&#39;t you feel like MSN Adcenter is kinda &quot;going thru the motions&quot; but not really understanding the Industry and it&#39;s effect in the marketing world? Here are just a few thoughts as to why MSN has dropped the ball on this Tool</p>
<ul>
<li>They figure not too many people are spending enough with MSN anyway to justify the time.</li>
<li>Would rather force the PPC Advertiser to use a 3rd party PPC software tool do the work for them</li>
<li>They are totally &quot;not in tune&quot; with the Search Marketing Industry as a whole.&#0160;</li>
<li>Lack of Priority, since they are focusing so much time and effort on BING</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><em><span style="color: #111111;">MSN does not need a Decision Engine, they just need to make a Good Decision to support their advertisers.</span></em></strong><span style="color: #111111;"></span><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="color: #111111;"><br /></span></span>
<p><strong><span style="color: #c00000;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Did you know:</span> If you enter the phrase &quot;Decision Engine&quot; into your Text Ads within MSN AdCenter, they will not allow it?</span></strong></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://www.semgeek.com/msn-adcenter-desktop-ppc-tool-leaves-ppc-mac-people-in-the-dark/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><div style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0px" id="linksalpha_tag_681953900" class="linksalpha-email-button" data-url="http://www.semgeek.com/msn-adcenter-desktop-ppc-tool-leaves-ppc-mac-people-in-the-dark/" data-text="MSN AdCenter Desktop PPC Tool Leaves PPC Mac People In The Dark" data-desc=" As MSN AdCenter continues to remain at the bottom of the SEM (Market Share) Pool, you would think that Microsoft would put their rivalry with Apple aside and focus their efforts on the PPC advertiser and not their Egos. It&#39;s surprising, because their support team is pretty good and listens well to their clients, while their online interface and everything else is not that impressive.Imagine the growth possibilities if they would just make it easier for their advertisers to spend more money " data-site=""></div><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.linksalpha.com/social/loader?script_type=buttons_counters&tag_id=linksalpha_tag_681953900&link=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.semgeek.com%2Fmsn-adcenter-desktop-ppc-tool-leaves-ppc-mac-people-in-the-dark%2F&gplus=1&twitter=1&fbsend=1&linkedin=1&gbuzz=0&tumblr=0&reddit=0&pinterest=0&digg=0&stumbleupon=0&gpluslang=en-US&twitterlang=en&fbsendlang=en_US&gbuzzlang=en&twittermention=&twitterrelated1=&twitterrelated2=&halign=center"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.semgeek.com/msn-adcenter-desktop-ppc-tool-leaves-ppc-mac-people-in-the-dark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

